Skip to content

Confinement Time Scaling Laws

The energy confinement time \tau_E is calculated using one of a choice of empirical scalings. (\tau_E is defined below.)

Many energy confinement time scaling laws are available within PROCESS, for tokamaks, RFPs and stellarators. These are calculated in routine pcond. The value of isc determines which of the scalings is used in the plasma energy balance calculation. The table below summarises the available scaling laws. The most commonly used is the so-called IPB98(y,2) scaling.

isc scaling law reference
1 Neo-Alcator (ohmic) 1
2 Mirnov (H-mode) 1
3 Merezhkin-Muhkovatov (L-mode) 1
4 Shimomura (H-mode) JAERI-M 87-080 (1987)
5 Kaye-Goldston (L-mode) Nuclear Fusion 25 (1985) p.65
6 ITER 89-P (L-mode) Nuclear Fusion 30 (1990) p.1999
7 ITER 89-O (L-mode) 2
8 Rebut-Lallia (L-mode) Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research 2 (1987) p. 187
9 Goldston (L-mode) Plas. Phys. Controlled Fusion 26 (1984) p.87
10 T10 (L-mode) 2
11 JAERI-88 (L-mode) JAERI-M 88-068 (1988)
12 Kaye-Big Complex (L-mode) Phys. Fluids B 2 (1990) p.2926
13 ITER H90-P (H-mode)
14 ITER Mix (minimum of 6 and 7)
15 Riedel (L-mode)
16 Christiansen et al. (L-mode) JET Report JET-P (1991) 03
17 Lackner-Gottardi (L-mode) Nuclear Fusion 30 (1990) p.767
18 Neo-Kaye (L-mode) 2
19 Riedel (H-mode)
20 ITER H90-P (amended) Nuclear Fusion 32 (1992) p.318
21 Large Helical Device (stellarator) Nuclear Fusion 30 (1990)
22 Gyro-reduced Bohm (stellarator) Bull. Am. Phys. Society, 34 (1989) p.1964
23 Lackner-Gottardi (stellarator) Nuclear Fusion 30 (1990) p.767
24 ITER-93H (H-mode) PPCF, Proc. 15th Int. Conf.Seville, 1994 IAEA-CN-60/E-P-3
25 TITAN (RFP) TITAN RFP Fusion Reactor Study, Scoping Phase Report, UCLA-PPG-1100, page 5--9, Jan 1987
26 ITER H-97P ELM-free (H-mode) J. G. Cordey et al., EPS Berchtesgaden, 1997
27 ITER H-97P ELMy (H-mode) J. G. Cordey et al., EPS Berchtesgaden, 1997
28 ITER-96P (= ITER97-L) (L-mode) Nuclear Fusion 37 (1997) p.1303
29 Valovic modified ELMy (H-mode)
30 Kaye PPPL April 98 (L-mode)
31 ITERH-PB98P(y) (H-mode)
32 IPB98(y) (H-mode) Nuclear Fusion 39 (1999) p.2175, Table 5,
33 IPB98(y,1) (H-mode) Nuclear Fusion 39 (1999) p.2175, Table 5, full data
34 IPB98(y,2) (H-mode) Nuclear Fusion 39 (1999) p.2175, Table 5, NBI only
35 IPB98(y,3) (H-mode) Nuclear Fusion 39 (1999) p.2175, Table 5, NBI only, no C-Mod
36 IPB98(y,4) (H-mode) Nuclear Fusion 39 (1999) p.2175, Table 5, NBI only ITER like
37 ISS95 (stellarator) Nuclear Fusion 36 (1996) p.1063
38 ISS04 (stellarator) Nuclear Fusion 45 (2005) p.1684
39 DS03 (H-mode) Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 50 (2008) 043001, equation 4.13
40 Non-power law (H-mode) A. Murari et al 2015 Nucl. Fusion 55 073009, Table 4.
41 Petty 2008 (H-mode) C.C. Petty 2008 Phys. Plasmas 15 080501, equation 36
42 Lang 2012 (H-mode) P.T. Lang et al. 2012 IAEA conference proceeding EX/P4-01
43 Hubbard 2017 -- nominal (I-mode) A.E. Hubbard et al. 2017, Nuclear Fusion 57 126039
44 Hubbard 2017 -- lower (I-mode) A.E. Hubbard et al. 2017, Nuclear Fusion 57 126039
45 Hubbard 2017 -- upper (I-mode) A.E. Hubbard et al. 2017, Nuclear Fusion 57 126039
46 NSTX (H-mode; spherical tokamak) J. Menard 2019, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 377:201704401
47 NSTX-Petty08 Hybrid (H-mode) J. Menard 2019, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 377:201704401
48 NSTX gyro-Bohm (Buxton) (H-mode; spherical tokamak) P. Buxton et al. 2019 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 61 035006
49 Use input tauee_in
50 ITPA20 (H-mode) G. Verdoolaege et al 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 076006

Effect of radiation on energy confinement

Published confinement scalings are all based on low radiation pulses. A power plant will certainly be a high radiation machine --- both in the core, due to bremsstrahlung and synchrotron radiation, and in the edge due to impurity seeding. The scaling data do not predict this radiation --- that needs to be done by the radiation model. However, if the transport is very "stiff", as predicted by some models, then the additional radiation causes an almost equal drop in power transported by ions and electrons, leaving the confinement nearly unchanged.

To allow for these uncertainties, three options are available, using the switch iradloss. In each case, the particle transport loss power pscaling is derived directly from the energy confinement scaling law.

iradloss = 0 -- Total power lost is scaling power plus radiation:

pscaling + pradpv = falpha*palppv + pchargepv + pohmpv + pinjmw/vol

iradloss = 1 -- Total power lost is scaling power plus radiation from a region defined as the "core":

pscaling + pcoreradpv = falpha*palppv + pchargepv + pohmpv + pinjmw/vol

iradloss = 2 -- Total power lost is scaling power only, with no additional allowance for radiation. This is not recommended for power plant models.

pscaling = falpha*palppv + pchargepv + pohmpv + pinjmw/vol

L-H Power Threshold Scalings

Transitions from a standard confinement mode (L-mode) to an improved confinement regime (H-mode), called L-H transitions, are observed in most tokamaks. A range of scaling laws are available that provide estimates of the heating power required to initiate these transitions, via extrapolations from present-day devices. PROCESS calculates these power threshold values for the scaling laws listed in the table below, in routine pthresh.

For an H-mode plasma, use input parameter ilhthresh to select the scaling to use, and turn on constraint equation no. 15 with iteration variable no. 103 (flhthresh). By default, this will ensure that the power reaching the divertor is at least equal to the threshold power calculated for the chosen scaling, which is a necessary condition for H-mode.

For an L-mode plasma, use input parameter ilhthresh to select the scaling to use, and turn on constraint equation no. 15 with iteration variable no. 103 (flhthresh). Set lower and upper bounds for the f-value boundl(103) = 0.001 and boundu(103) = 1.0 to ensure that the power does not exceed the calculated threshold, and therefore the machine remains in L-mode.

ilhthresh Name Reference
1 ITER 1996 nominal ITER Physics Design Description Document
2 ITER 1996 upper bound D. Boucher, p.2-2
3 ITER 1996 lower bound
4 ITER 1997 excluding elongation J. A. Snipes, ITER H-mode Threshold Database
5 ITER 1997 including elongation Working Group, Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, 24th EPS conference, Berchtesgaden, June 1997, vol.21A, part III, p.961
6 Martin 2008 nominal Martin et al, 11th IAEA Tech. Meeting
7 Martin 2008 95% upper bound H-mode Physics and Transport Barriers, Journal
8 Martin 2008 95% lower bound of Physics: Conference Series 123, 2008
9 Snipes 2000 nominal J. A. Snipes and the International H-mode
10 Snipes 2000 upper bound Threshold Database Working Group
11 Snipes 2000 lower bound 2000, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 42, A299
12 Snipes 2000 (closed divertor): nominal
13 Snipes 2000 (closed divertor): upper bound
14 Snipes 2000 (closed divertor): lower bound
15 Hubbard 2012 L-I threshold scaling: nominal Hubbard et al. (2012; Nucl. Fusion 52 114009)
16 Hubbard 2012 L-I threshold scaling: lower bound [Hubbard et al. (2012; Nucl. Fusion 52 114009)](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0029-5515/52/11/114009
17 Hubbard 2012 L-I threshold scaling: upper bound [Hubbard et al. (2012; Nucl. Fusion 52 114009)](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0029-5515/52/11/114009
18 Hubbard 2017 L-I threshold scaling Hubbard et al. (2017; Nucl. Fusion 57 126039)
19 Martin 2008 aspect ratio corrected nominal Martin et al (2008; J Phys Conf, 123, 012033)
20 Martin 2008 aspect ratio corrected 95% upper bound Takizuka et al. (2004; Plasma Phys. Contol. Fusion, 46, A227)
21 Martin 2008 aspect ratio corrected 95% lower bound

Ignition

Switch ignite can be used to denote whether the plasma is ignited, i.e. fully self-sustaining without the need for any injected auxiliary power during the burn. If ignite = 1, the calculated injected power does not contribute to the plasma power balance, although the cost of the auxiliary power system is taken into account (the system is then assumed to be required to provide heating and/or current drive during the plasma start-up phase only). If ignite = 0, the plasma is not ignited, and the auxiliary power is taken into account in the plasma power balance during the burn phase. An ignited plasma will be difficult to control and is unlikely to be practical. This option is not recommended.


  1. T. C. Hender et al., 'Physics Assessment for the European Reactor Study', AEA Fusion Report AEA FUS 172 (1992) 

  2. N.A. Uckan and ITER Physics Group, 'ITER Physics Design Guidelines: 1989', ITER Documentation Series, No. 10, IAEA/ITER/DS/10 (1990)