Scrape off Layer | ScrapeOffLayer
Parallel energy flux density
The peak unmitigated parallel upstream energy flux density, q_{\parallel,u} [\text{W} \text{m}^{-2}] is given by3 4:
P_{\text{up}} is defined as P_{\text{sep}}f_{\text{div}}, where P_{\text{sep}} is the plasma separatrix power and f_{\text{div}} is the fraction of the power directed to the divertor. \lambda_{\text{q,u}} is the upstream power decay length, R_{\text{u}} is the midplane separatrix radius, B_{\text{Tot,u}} is the total magnetic field strength at the midplane separatrix and B_{\text{p,u}} is the poloidal magnetic field strength at the midplane separatrix.
Parallel area | calculate_upstream_sol_outboard_parallel_area()
The outboard parallel SOL flux area A_{\parallel,u} [\text{m}^2] can be envisaged as a ribbon going around the outboard circumference of the plasma of width \lambda_{\text{q,u}}. It is then weighted by the field ratio \frac{B_{\text{p,u}}}{B_{\text{Tot,u}}} to account for the field line angle at the outboard midplane:
Upstream radial decay | calculate_outboard_midplane_near_sol_radial_profile()
The radial decay length \lambda_{\text{q}} of the scrape-off layer (SOL) at the outer midplane of a tokamak is defined as the e-folding distance over which plasma heat and particle fluxes decay exponentially outside the last closed flux surface. Therefore the decay of the total heat flux outside the separatrix towards the vessel walls can be modelled as 5 1:
where r = R - R_{\text{sep}}, R_{\text{sep}} being the major radius of the separatrix, \lambda_{\text{q}} the power decay length and q_{\parallel} the upstream energy flux density
Eich parallel flux at target | calculate_eich_target_heat_flux_profile()
The Eich formula (often called the standard SOL heat flux profile) is the primary mathematical model used to describe the distribution of heat target loads on tokamak divertor plates. It convolutionally connects the physics of the plasma edge at the outer midplane with the geometric projection of the heat hitting the divertor surface 5 1.
Heat transport into the private flux region is modeled by convolving the power profile q_{\text{u}}(r) with a Gaussian function of width S known as the spreading parameter.
where s is the coordinate along the divertor target, s_0 is the strike-point location on the target, \operatorname{erfc} is the complementary error function, q_{\text{BG}} is the background heat flux, \lambda_{\text{q}} is the power decay length, f_x is the effective flux expansion in the region,
A compact equivalent form is:
The connection to upstream midplane coordinates is usually:
Power Decay Lengths
In tokamak scrape-off layer (SOL) physics, \lambda_q is the radial heat flux e-folding length, representing the narrow width over which exhaust power drops exponentially. It measures how tightly thermal energy exiting the core plasma is compressed onto open magnetic field lines.
Eich 2013 Model | calculate_eich2013_sol_power_decay_length()
The power decay length in metres is given by1:
Here P_{\text{sep}} is the plasma separatrix power in \text{MW}, R_0 is the plasma major radius in \text{m}, B_{\text{p}}(a) is the plasma poloidal field at the outboard mid-plane measured in \text{T} and \epsilon is the plasma inverse aspect ratio.
This can be found in Table 3 from Eich et.al 1
The R^2 value for this fit is 0.88
MAST 2014 I | calculate_mast2014_sol_power_decay_length_1()
The power decay length in metres is given by2:
Here P_{\text{sep}} is the plasma separatrix power in \text{MW}, and B_{\text{p}}(a) is the plasma poloidal field at the outboard mid-plane measured in \text{T}.
This can be found in Table 2 and Equation 3 from Thornton et.al 2
The R^2 value for this fit is 0.56
MAST 2014 II | calculate_mast2014_sol_power_decay_length_2()
The power decay length in metres is given by2:
Here P_{\text{sep}} is the plasma separatrix power in \text{MW}, and I_{\text{p}} is the total plasma current measured in \text{MA}.
This can be found in Table 2 and Equation 4 from Thornton et.al 2
The R^2 value for this fit is 0.55
Eich 2011 JET Model | calculate_eich2011_jet_sol_power_decay_length()
The power decay length in metres is given by5:
Here B_{\text{T,0}} is the on axis toroidal magnetic field, q_{\text{cyl}} is the cylindrical safety factor and P_{\text{sep}} is the plasma separatrix power in \text{MW}.
This can be found in Table 2 from Eich et.al 5
The scaling is done for type-I ELMy H-mode plasmas
Eich 2011 JET+ASDEX Model | calculate_eich2011_jet_asdex_sol_power_decay_length()
The power decay length in metres is given by5:
Here B_{\text{T,0}} is the on axis toroidal magnetic field, q_{\text{cyl}} is the cylindrical safety factor, P_{\text{sep}} is the plasma separatrix power in \text{MW} and R_0 is the plasma major radius.
This can be found in Table 2 from Eich et.al 5
The scaling is done for type-I ELMy H-mode plasmas
Spreading Parameter
The scrape-off layer (SOL) spreading parameter S represents a Gaussian width that quantifies additional perpendicular heat spreading in the divertor leg. It works alongside the upstream heat flux decay length \lambda_{q} to determine total target heat loads on the divertor.
Unlike \lambda_{q}, which is governed by robust upstream parallel and perpendicular transport physics at the plasma midplane, S is inherently a "local" divertor parameter. Deriving a single, absolute multi-machine formula for S is incredibly difficult due to several overlapping regional variables:
-
Divertor Geometry: The path length from the X-point to the target tile heavily impacts how much the heat spreads radially.
-
Plasma Recycling Regimes: Low-recycling, high-recycling, and detached plasma conditions completely alter the cross-field diffusion rates.
-
Localized Radiation: Impurity seeding and neutral gas interactions dissipate power unevenly along the divertor leg, altering the effective Gaussian profile width.
Scarabosio 2015 | calculate_scarabosio2015_power_spreading_factor()
The H-mode SOL spreading factor, S is given in \text{m} by6:
- This was fitted from ASDEX Upgrade and JET outer target data
- The R^2 value of the regression fit was 0.65
-
T. Eich et al., “Scaling of the tokamak near the scrape-off layer H-mode power width and implications for ITER,” Nuclear Fusion, vol. 53, no. 9 p. 093031, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/53/9/093031. ↩↩↩↩
-
A. J. Thornton and A. Kirk, “Scaling of the scrape-off layer width during inter-ELM H modes on MAST as measured by infrared thermography,” Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 56, no. 5, p. 055008, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/56/5/055008. ↩↩↩↩
-
P. C. Stangeby, “The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices,” Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1201/9780367801489. ↩
-
S. S. Henderson et al., “An overview of the STEP divertor design and the simple models driving the plasma exhaust scenario,” Nuclear Fusion, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 016033–016033, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1088/1741-4326/ad93e7. ↩
-
T. Eich, B. Sieglin, A. Scarabosio, W. Fundamenski, R. J. Goldston, and A. Herrmann, “Inter-ELM Power Decay Length for JET and ASDEX Upgrade: Measurement and Comparison with Heuristic Drift-Based Model,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, no. 21, Nov. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.215001 ↩↩↩↩↩↩
-
A. Scarabosio et al., “Scaling of the divertor power spreading (S-factor) in open and closed divertor operation in JET and ASDEX Upgrade,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 463, pp. 49-54, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.11.076. ↩